Study for the Public Health Nursing Exam. Prepare with flashcards and multiple-choice questions, each question has hints and explanations. Get ready for your exam today!

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.


What is the most recommended governmental strategy to prepare for potential bioterrorism threats?

  1. Banning all biological weapons

  2. Developing biological agent antidotes

  3. Effective detection and service management

  4. Threatening countries against weapon development

The correct answer is: Effective detection and service management

The most recommended governmental strategy to prepare for potential bioterrorism threats is effective detection and service management. This approach emphasizes the importance of early identification of bioterrorism events through robust surveillance systems that can swiftly detect biological agents in the environment or the population. It also involves the coordination of response services to effectively manage any incidents that may arise from such threats. Effective detection systems can range from advanced laboratory methodologies and diagnostic tools to community health surveillance mechanisms. By establishing strong detection systems, public health officials can respond promptly to an outbreak or attack, mitigating the impact on public health and safety. Service management encompasses the preparedness and resource allocation necessary for a rapid response, which is crucial in minimizing harm to the community during a bioterrorism incident. The other strategies, while they may contribute to overall security and preparedness, do not directly address the immediate need for detection and prompt response. For instance, banning all biological weapons addresses a broader issue of weapon proliferation but does not prepare for existing threats. Developing biological agent antidotes is important, but without effective detection, there won't be timely use of these antidotes in an actual event. Threatening countries against weapon development does not provide a proactive means of preparing for potential attacks, as it relies on diplomatic measures rather than